Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:55:36 +0000 (UTC) | From | Mathieu Desnoyers <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE |
| |
----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org> > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> > Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Thomas > Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, "David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>, > "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:54:54 AM > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE > [...]
(keeping discussion for later, as I'm busy at a client site) > For now, I'm going to push this in, and also mark it for stable.
Which patch or patches do you plan to pull, and which is marked for stable ?
This thread is a RFC PATCH. I posted a separate more complete patch in a separate thread marked [PATCH].
Thanks,
Mathieu
-- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
| |