Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Feb 2014 14:23:44 -0800 (PST) | From | David Rientjes <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V6 ] mm readahead: Fix readahead fail for memoryless cpu and limit readahead pages |
| |
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> Currently max_sane_readahead() returns zero on the cpu having no local memory node > which leads to readahead failure. Fix the readahead failure by returning > minimum of (requested pages, 512). Users running application on a memory-less cpu > which needs readahead such as streaming application see considerable boost in the > performance. > > Result: > fadvise experiment with FADV_WILLNEED on a PPC machine having memoryless CPU > with 1GB testfile ( 12 iterations) yielded around 46.66% improvement. > > fadvise experiment with FADV_WILLNEED on a x240 machine with 1GB testfile > 32GB* 4G RAM numa machine ( 12 iterations) showed no impact on the normal > NUMA cases w/ patch. > > Kernel Avg Stddev > base 7.4975 3.92% > patched 7.4174 3.26% > > Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> > [Andrew: making return value PAGE_SIZE independent] > Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
So this replaces mm-readaheadc-fix-readahead-fail-for-no-local-memory-and-limit-readahead-pages.patch in -mm correct?
> --- > I would like to thank Honza, David for their valuable suggestions and > patiently reviewing the patches. > > Changes in V6: > - Just limit the readahead to 2MB on 4k pages system as suggested by Linus. > and make it independent of PAGE_SIZE. >
I'm not sure I understand why we want to be independent of PAGE_SIZE since we're still relying on PAGE_CACHE_SIZE. Don't you mean to do
#define MAX_READAHEAD ((512*PAGE_SIZE)/PAGE_CACHE_SIZE)
instead?
| |