Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] intel_pstate updates for v3.14-rcX | Date | Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:43:44 +0100 |
| |
On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 04:24:02 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote: > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 03:53:48 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote: > > > On 02/18/2014 02:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:29:54 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote: > > > >> Hi Rafael, > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > >> On 02/12/2014 10:01 AM, dirk.brandewie@gmail.com <javascript:;>wrote: > > > >>> From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com <javascript:;>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Based on v3.14-rc2 > > > >>> > > > >>> Patch 1 removes energy reporting the patch from Maurizio Lambardi > > > >>> intel_pstate: fix race condition in intel_pstate_init() can be > > dropped. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> Any reason why patches 2-5 did not make rc3 other than timing? > > > >> > > > >> Patches 2/3 can easily wait for v3.15.x > > > >> > > > >> Patches 4/5 fix bugs that are in the wild. > > > > > > > > I asked you about them, but you didn't reply: > > > > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=139225158531023&w=4 > > > > > > > > Again, do patches [4-5/5] depend on [2-3/5]? > > > > > > > > If not, I can queue them up for -rc4. > > > > > > All the patches are independent of one another. > > > > > > Patch 2 is straight cleanup no functional change but reduces the memory > > > footprint slightly. > > > > > > Patch 3 is a bug that will only be seen when the PID is reset at init > > time > > > or when a change is made to PID params via debugfs. The problem will > > only > > > exist for one sample time since it is setting last_err in the PID. > > > > > > Patch 4-5 are bugs found during Baytrail-T testing > > > > Are there any pointers to bug reports that may be included in the > > changelogs > > of these? > > > No. I got the reports via email. I could probably get the reporters to > file bugzillas.
It would be good to add information about what machines are affected and what the user-visible problems are to the changelogs for future reference.
And do we want these two patches in -stable? If so, what -stable series should they go into?
Rafael
| |