lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v17 0/10] Add 32 bit VDSO time function support
From
Date
Am Samstag, den 15.02.2014, 20:14 -0800 schrieb H. Peter Anvin:
> On 02/15/2014 08:32 AM, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> > This patch add the functions vdso_gettimeofday(), vdso_clock_gettime()
> > and vdso_time() to the 32 bit VDSO.
>
> x86-64 allyesconfig:
>
> AS arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/int80.o
> /home/hpa/kernel/distwork/arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/../vclock_gettime.c:128:4: warning:
> symbol 'hpet_page' was not declared
> . Should it be static?
> /home/hpa/kernel/distwork/arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/../vclock_gettime.c:134:33:
> warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (diff
> erent address spaces)
> /home/hpa/kernel/distwork/arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/../vclock_gettime.c:134:33:
> expected void const volatile [noderef] <
> asn:2>*addr
> /home/hpa/kernel/distwork/arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/../vclock_gettime.c:134:33:
> got unsigned char [toplevel] *
> /home/hpa/kernel/distwork/arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/../vclock_gettime.c:294:13:
> warning: symbol '__vdso_clock_gettime' was
> not declared. Should it be static?
> /home/hpa/kernel/distwork/arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/../vclock_gettime.c:322:13:
> warning: symbol '__vdso_gettimeofday' was n
> ot declared. Should it be static?
> /home/hpa/kernel/distwork/arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/../vclock_gettime.c:343:16:
> warning: symbol '__vdso_time' was not decla
> red. Should it be static?
> CC arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.o
> /home/hpa/kernel/distwork/arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.c:1:0:
> sorry, unimplemented: -mfentry isn’t supported fo
> r 32-bit in combination with -fpic
> #define BUILD_VDSO32
> ^
> make[4]: *** [arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.o] Error 1
>
>
> My patience is wearing really thin. If I get another patchset that
> doesn't compile in allyesconfig, allmodconfig, allnoconfig and defconfig
> on both i386 and x86-64, I will put this patchset at the very bottom of
> my priority list.
>
> I strongly suggest also installing sparse and compiling with C=1 and
> fixing all *those* warnings.
>

All of the "__vdso__... was not declared" warnings was not introduced by
me. But i can fix if you like.

The "sorry, unimplemented: -mfentry isn’t supported for 32-bit in
combination with -fpic" did not occur on my system. I think it is a
compiler issues, i am using for x86_64 the gcc 4.3.4.

I will add a

KBUILD_CFLAGS_32 := $(filter-out -mfentry,$(KBUILD_CFLAGS_32))

to the arch/x86/vdso/Makefile.

Hope this solve your problem.

Since i have only a 7 year old system with am intel quad "Core 2" 2.54
GHz and a SATA II interface i am not able to run the suggested ktest
tool. This would take days! A simple allyesconfig for a X86_64 takes
about 2 hours.

What i will do now is run again a allyesconfig for i386 and X86_64 and
next a allnoconfig and defconfig. I see no reason to a allmodconfig
since there is no module dependency in this patch set.

I will not test the X86_X32 since i have no environment for this. Nor
the CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL since my compiler does not support this.

That is the best effort i currently can do in my spare time. If this is
not enough i have no idea how to continue.

- Stefani


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-16 10:01    [W:0.089 / U:12.928 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site