[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/11] vfs: More precise tests in d_invalidate (Eric W. Biederman) writes:

> But when shrink_dcache_parent and check_submounts_and_drop are
> effectiely the same function I can't possibly see how you can argue how
> the locking has changed or that I am trying to hide things.

And in particular the only locking change that I can see at all is that
d_walk takes read_seqbegin_or_lock before checking the if the d_subdirs
list is empty, which is just an extra cache line read.

Which in practical terms appears like I have removed unnecessary special
cases in favor less code. Which I think if anything should perform
better just because there is less code to run, and what is happening is
less obfuscated.


 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-16 01:21    [W:0.101 / U:110.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site