lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v16 03/10] revamp vclock_gettime.c
Date
This intermediate patch revamps the vclock_gettime.c by moving some functions
around. It is only for spliting purpose, to make whole the 32 bit vdso timer
patch easier to review.

Signed-off-by: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
---
arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c b/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
index eb5d7a5..bbc8065 100644
--- a/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
+++ b/arch/x86/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
@@ -26,41 +26,26 @@

#define gtod (&VVAR(vsyscall_gtod_data))

-notrace static cycle_t vread_tsc(void)
+static notrace cycle_t vread_hpet(void)
{
- cycle_t ret;
- u64 last;
-
- /*
- * Empirically, a fence (of type that depends on the CPU)
- * before rdtsc is enough to ensure that rdtsc is ordered
- * with respect to loads. The various CPU manuals are unclear
- * as to whether rdtsc can be reordered with later loads,
- * but no one has ever seen it happen.
- */
- rdtsc_barrier();
- ret = (cycle_t)vget_cycles();
-
- last = VVAR(vsyscall_gtod_data).clock.cycle_last;
-
- if (likely(ret >= last))
- return ret;
+ return readl((const void __iomem *)fix_to_virt(VSYSCALL_HPET) + HPET_COUNTER);
+}

- /*
- * GCC likes to generate cmov here, but this branch is extremely
- * predictable (it's just a funciton of time and the likely is
- * very likely) and there's a data dependence, so force GCC
- * to generate a branch instead. I don't barrier() because
- * we don't actually need a barrier, and if this function
- * ever gets inlined it will generate worse code.
- */
- asm volatile ("");
- return last;
+notrace static long vdso_fallback_gettime(long clock, struct timespec *ts)
+{
+ long ret;
+ asm("syscall" : "=a" (ret) :
+ "0" (__NR_clock_gettime), "D" (clock), "S" (ts) : "memory");
+ return ret;
}

-static notrace cycle_t vread_hpet(void)
+notrace static long vdso_fallback_gtod(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz)
{
- return readl((const void __iomem *)fix_to_virt(VSYSCALL_HPET) + HPET_COUNTER);
+ long ret;
+
+ asm("syscall" : "=a" (ret) :
+ "0" (__NR_gettimeofday), "D" (tv), "S" (tz) : "memory");
+ return ret;
}

#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_CLOCK
@@ -133,23 +118,37 @@ static notrace cycle_t vread_pvclock(int *mode)
}
#endif

-notrace static long vdso_fallback_gettime(long clock, struct timespec *ts)
+notrace static cycle_t vread_tsc(void)
{
- long ret;
- asm("syscall" : "=a" (ret) :
- "0" (__NR_clock_gettime),"D" (clock), "S" (ts) : "memory");
- return ret;
-}
+ cycle_t ret;
+ u64 last;

-notrace static long vdso_fallback_gtod(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz)
-{
- long ret;
+ /*
+ * Empirically, a fence (of type that depends on the CPU)
+ * before rdtsc is enough to ensure that rdtsc is ordered
+ * with respect to loads. The various CPU manuals are unclear
+ * as to whether rdtsc can be reordered with later loads,
+ * but no one has ever seen it happen.
+ */
+ rdtsc_barrier();
+ ret = (cycle_t)vget_cycles();

- asm("syscall" : "=a" (ret) :
- "0" (__NR_gettimeofday), "D" (tv), "S" (tz) : "memory");
- return ret;
-}
+ last = VVAR(vsyscall_gtod_data).clock.cycle_last;

+ if (likely(ret >= last))
+ return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * GCC likes to generate cmov here, but this branch is extremely
+ * predictable (it's just a funciton of time and the likely is
+ * very likely) and there's a data dependence, so force GCC
+ * to generate a branch instead. I don't barrier() because
+ * we don't actually need a barrier, and if this function
+ * ever gets inlined it will generate worse code.
+ */
+ asm volatile ("");
+ return last;
+}

notrace static inline u64 vgetsns(int *mode)
{
--
1.8.5.4


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-14 15:41    [W:0.127 / U:10.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site