Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | From | Jingoo Han <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] pci: Add support for creating a generic host_bridge from device tree | Date | Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:18:39 +0900 |
| |
On
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jingoo Han [mailto:jg1.han@samsung.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 5:10 PM > To: 'Liviu Dudau'; 'Tanmay Inamdar' > Cc: 'Arnd Bergmann'; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; 'linaro-kernel'; 'linux-pci'; 'Will Deacon'; 'LKML'; > 'Catalin Marinas'; 'Bjorn Helgaas'; 'LAKML'; 'Jingoo Han' > Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: Add support for creating a generic host_bridge from device tree > > On Thursday, February 06, 2014 7:18 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:26:27PM +0000, Tanmay Inamdar wrote: > > > Hello Liviu, > > > > > > I did not get the first email of this particular patch on any of > > > subscribed mailing lists (don't know why), hence replying here. > > > > Strange, it shows in the MARC and GMANE archive for linux-pci, probably > > a hickup on your receiving side? > > > > > > > > +struct pci_host_bridge * > > > +pci_host_bridge_of_init(struct device *parent, int busno, struct pci_ops *ops, > > > + void *host_data, struct list_head *resources) > > > +{ > > > + struct pci_bus *root_bus; > > > + struct pci_host_bridge *bridge; > > > + > > > + /* first parse the host bridge bus ranges */ > > > + if (pci_host_bridge_of_get_ranges(parent->of_node, resources)) > > > + return NULL; > > > + > > > + /* then create the root bus */ > > > + root_bus = pci_create_root_bus(parent, busno, ops, host_data, resources); > > > + if (!root_bus) > > > + return NULL; > > > + > > > + bridge = to_pci_host_bridge(root_bus->bridge); > > > + > > > + return bridge; > > > +} > > > > > > You are keeping the domain_nr inside pci_host_bridge structure. In > > > above API, domain_nr is required in 'pci_find_bus' function called > > > from 'pci_create_root_bus'. Since the bridge is allocated after > > > creating root bus, 'pci_find_bus' always gets domain_nr as 0. This > > > will cause problem for scanning multiple domains. > > > > Good catch. I was switching between creating a pci_controller in arch/arm64 and > > adding the needed bits in pci_host_bridge. After internal review I've decided to > > add the domain_nr to pci_host_bridge, but forgot to update the code everywhere. > > Hi Liviu Dudau, > > One more thing, > I am reviewing and compiling your patch. > Would you consider adding 'struct pci_sys_data' and 'struct hw_pci'? > > Currently, 4 PCIe Host drivers (pci-mvebu.c, pci-tegra.c, > pci-rcar-gen2.c, pcie-designware.c) are using 'struct pci_sys_data' > and 'struct hw_pci' in their drivers. Without this, it makes build > errors. > > In arm32, 'struct pci_sys_data' and 'struct hw_pci' is defined > in "arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h". > > Tanmay Inamdar, > Your 'APM X-Gene PCIe' patch also needs 'struct pci_sys_data' and > 'struct hw_pci'. With Liviu Dudau's patch, it will make build > errors. Would you check this?
I mean the patch '[PATCH] arm64: Add architecture support for PCI'. With this patch, it makes build errors in PCIe Host drivers such as pcie-designware.c.
Best regards, Jingoo Han
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |