lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm: fix invalid use of pfn_valid_within in test_pages_in_a_zone
(2014/12/10 4:34), James Custer wrote:
> Offlining memory by 'echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory#/online'
> or reading valid_zones 'cat /sys/devices/system/memory/memory#/valid_zones'

> causes BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request due to invalid use of
> pfn_valid_within. This is due to a bug in test_pages_in_a_zone.

The information is not enough to understand what happened on your system.
Could you show full BUG messages?

>
> In order to use pfn_valid_within within a MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES block of pages,
> a valid pfn within the block must first be found. There only needs to be
> one valid pfn found in test_pages_in_a_zone in the first place. So the
> fix is to replace pfn_valid_within with pfn_valid such that the first
> valid pfn within the pageblock is found (if it exists). This works
> independently of CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Custer <jcuster@sgi.com>
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 1bf4807..304c187 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1331,7 +1331,7 @@ int is_mem_section_removable(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Confirm all pages in a range [start, end) is belongs to the same zone.
> + * Confirm all pages in a range [start, end) belong to the same zone.
> */
> int test_pages_in_a_zone(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> {
> @@ -1342,10 +1342,11 @@ int test_pages_in_a_zone(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> for (pfn = start_pfn;
> pfn < end_pfn;
> pfn += MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES) {

> - i = 0;
> - /* This is just a CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE check.*/
> - while ((i < MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES) && !pfn_valid_within(pfn + i))
> - i++;
> + /* Find the first valid pfn in this pageblock */
> + for (i = 0; i < MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES; i++) {
> + if (pfn_valid(pfn + i))
> + break;
> + }

If CONFIG_HOLES_IN_NODE is set, there is no difference. Am I making a mistake?

Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu


> if (i == MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES)
> continue;
> page = pfn_to_page(pfn + i);
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-12-10 01:41    [W:0.058 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site