lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/6] net-PPP: Replacement of a printk() call by pr_warn() in mppe_rekey()
... ciao:

: on "12-4-2014" "Joe Perches" writ:
: > Does it make sense to express such implementation details in the Linux
: > coding style documentation more explicitly (besides the fact that this
: > update suggestion was also triggered by a warning from the script
: > "checkpatch.pl".
:
: Probably not.
:
: Overly formalized coding style rules are perhaps
: more of a barrier to entry than most want.

funny you should mention that. as nothing more than a casual observer,
i'm noticing a "TIRED" sensation reading this thread. i have "0"
confidence a "SERIOUS" participant's enthusiasm would remain untested.

however, the "checkpatch.pl" warning suggests an assumed 'custom'. i
can't tell if this a 'serious' issue, or "pickin' fly shit out of pepper".

but from my reading of it, the "CODE" , and the "logic" driving it, is
not the problem.

season's best ...

--
... it's not what you see ,
but in stead , notice ...


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-12-06 00:41    [W:0.604 / U:0.432 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site