Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:00:44 +0100 | From | SF Markus Elfring <> | Subject | Re: [patch] CodingStyle: add some more error handling guidelines |
| |
>> Which name pattern do you find more appropriate in such >> an use case? > > I think Dan wants the label to be descriptive about the tasks > needed in the exception handling itself.
I would usually prefer also such a target-oriented labelling for the affected identifiers. How are the chances to express an expectation in this direction unambiguously for the proposed coding style update?
> This makes sense as the exception handling steps may be reused > for different failures in the code.
I would stress a different reason from my point of view.
Regards, Markus
| |