lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] CodingStyle: add some more error handling guidelines
>> Which name pattern do you find more appropriate in such
>> an use case?
>
> I think Dan wants the label to be descriptive about the tasks
> needed in the exception handling itself.

I would usually prefer also such a target-oriented labelling
for the affected identifiers.
How are the chances to express an expectation in this direction
unambiguously for the proposed coding style update?


> This makes sense as the exception handling steps may be reused
> for different failures in the code.

I would stress a different reason from my point of view.

Regards,
Markus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-12-03 17:41    [W:0.641 / U:0.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site