lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] Staging: lustre: lproc_osc.c: used seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()
From
Date
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 23:29 +0530, Hariharan Rangasamy wrote:
> Replaced seq_printf() with seq_puts()
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/lproc_osc.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/osc/lproc_osc.c
[]
> @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ static int osc_checksum_type_seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> else
> seq_printf(m, "%s ", cksum_name[i]);
> }
> - seq_printf(m, "\n");
> + seq_puts(m, "\n");

This could be seq_putc

> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -590,7 +590,7 @@ static int osc_rpc_stats_seq_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
> seq_printf(seq, "pending read pages: %d\n",
> atomic_read(&cli->cl_pending_r_pages));
>
> - seq_printf(seq, "\n\t\t\tread\t\t\twrite\n");
> + seq_puts(seq, "\n\t\t\tread\t\t\twrite\n");
> seq_printf(seq, "pages per rpc rpcs %% cum %% |");
> seq_printf(seq, " rpcs %% cum %%\n");

These and others could be seq_puts too, just use % instead of %%




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-12-17 20:01    [W:0.038 / U:0.652 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site