lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subject[RFC PATCH 0/2] tracing: The Grinch who stole the stealing of Christmas
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:14:20 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 21:35:14 +0100 (CET)
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
>
> > We're almost there with x86 but my gut feeling tells me that pushing
> > it now is too risky. I rather prefer quiet holidays for all of us than
> > the nagging fear that the post holiday inbox will be full of obscure
> > bug reports and we then start a chase and bandaid race which will kill
> > the well earned recreation in an instant.
>
>
> >
> > Though one issue with that is, that for the early boot process
> > there is no way to store that information as the tracer gets
> > enabled way after init_IRQ(). But there is no reason why the
> > tracer could not be enabled before that. All it needs is a
> > working memory allocator. Steven?
> >
> > Now there is another class of problems which might be hard to
> > debug. When the machine just boots into a hang, so we dont get a
> > ftrace output neither from an oops nor from a console. It would
> > be nice if we could have a command line option which prints
> > enabled trace points via (early_)printk. That would avoid
> > sending out ad hoc printk debug patches which will basically
> > provide the same information as the trace_points. That would be
> > useful for other hard to debug boot hangs as well. Steven?
>
> Sure sure, everyone gets a nice calm xmas except for poor Steven who
> has to hack on early tracepoints such that this will be ready for 3.20!
>
> -- Steve (The Grinch who Hacked on Christmas)

I guess I can enjoy my Holiday.

-- Steve


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-12-13 07:21    [W:0.170 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site