lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
Subjectlinux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
Hi Vinod,

After merging the slave-dma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:

drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c: In function 'at_xdmac_off':
drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c:317:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'writel_relaxed' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
at_xdmac_write(atxdmac, AT_XDMAC_GD, -1L);
^

Caused by commit e1f7c9eee707 ("dmaengine: at_xdmac: creation of the
atmel eXtended DMA Controller driver").

Also, lots of warnings like:

drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c: In function 'at_xdmac_prep_slave_sg':
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:64:16: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'dma_addr_t' [-Wformat=]
static struct _ddebug __aligned(8) \
^
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h:84:2: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA'
DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(descriptor, fmt); \
^
include/linux/device.h:1107:2: note: in expansion of macro 'dynamic_dev_dbg'
dynamic_dev_dbg(dev, format, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
^
drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c:621:3: note: in expansion of macro 'dev_dbg'
dev_dbg(chan2dev(chan),
^

I have used the slave-dma tree from next-20141106 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-11-10 02:41    [W:0.035 / U:5.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site