lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] Kernel Live Patching
    On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 07:51:57PM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
    > I don't think this specific example was generated.
    >
    > I also don't think including the whole kpatch automation into the kernel
    > tree is a viable development model for it. (Same would apply for kGraft
    > automation.)

    Why? We (IMHO incorrectly) used the argument of tight coupling to put
    perf into the kernel tree. Generating kernel live patches is way more
    integrated that it absolutely has to go into the tree to be able to do
    proper development on it in an integrated fashion.



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2014-11-06 20:21    [W:2.189 / U:0.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site