Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 30 Nov 2014 18:35:11 -0700 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: don't use rw_is_sync() to determine sync request |
| |
On 11/30/2014 05:01 PM, Shaohua Li wrote: > Buffer read is counted as sync in rw_is_sync(). If we use it, > blk_sq_make_request() will not do per-process plug any more. > > I haven't changed blk_mq_make_request() yet. It makes sense to dispatch > REQ_SYNC request immediately. But for buffer read, it's weird not to do > per-process plug, as buffer read doesn't need low latency. > blk_mq_merge_queue_io() isn't very helpful, as we don't have delay mechanism > there, the queue is immediately flushed, which makes the merge very > superficial.
A read is sync, buffered or not. A buffered read is every bit as latency sensitive as an O_DIRECT read. I think it'd be fine to modify rw_is_sync() to disregard REQ_AHEAD as sync (and ensure it's carried forward in the request flags, too). At least to the extent that we process plug and get the merging, since for streamed reads we'd soon be waiting on them anyway.
-- Jens Axboe
| |