lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Haswell-EP uncore support
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > I'm wondering if these should be just wrmsr's instead of wrmsrl's.
> > >
> > > Can we just shut up coverity please?
> >
> > I can manually dismiss them, I don't think the checker has the
> > information to determine this for itself.
>
> I suspect my out of line MSR patchkit would fix the warning
> as a side effect, because there would be a function call
> inbetween and the function always gets full u64.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/10/376
>
> So far it hasn't been reviewed. I'll keep reposting.

And if you do so, can you please add a proper 0/n cover letter which
explains the scope of the series. I'm tired of wading through N
patches to figure out whether this is something I should care of or
not.

Thanks,

tglx


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-11-28 00:01    [W:0.081 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site