Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 Nov 2014 23:30:12 +0100 (CET) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Haswell-EP uncore support |
| |
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > I'm wondering if these should be just wrmsr's instead of wrmsrl's. > > > > > > Can we just shut up coverity please? > > > > I can manually dismiss them, I don't think the checker has the > > information to determine this for itself. > > I suspect my out of line MSR patchkit would fix the warning > as a side effect, because there would be a function call > inbetween and the function always gets full u64. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/10/376 > > So far it hasn't been reviewed. I'll keep reposting.
And if you do so, can you please add a proper 0/n cover letter which explains the scope of the series. I'm tired of wading through N patches to figure out whether this is something I should care of or not.
Thanks,
tglx
| |