Messages in this thread | | | From | Heiko Stübner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4] clocksource: arch_timer: Allow the device tree to specify uninitialized timer registers | Date | Wed, 26 Nov 2014 13:55:55 +0100 |
| |
Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:49:57 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: > On 11/26/2014 01:48 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 13:30:58 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: > >> On 11/26/2014 01:06 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote: > >>> Hi Daniel, > >>> > >>> Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 12:51:08 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: > >>>> Hi Doug, Olof, > >>>> > >>>> IIUC, it sounds like this patch is needed from some other patches in > >>>> arm-soc. Olof was proposing to take this patch through its tree to > >>>> facilitate the integration. > >>>> > >>>> Olof, is it this patch you were worried about ? > >>> > >>> I think this is one of two patches in question. > >>> > >>> "clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical timers when > >>> requested" > >>> [0] would be the second one. > >>> > >>> And the patch for arm-soc that Olof means would be "ARM: dts: rk3288: > >>> add > >>> arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured" [1]. > >> > >> Ok, so IIUC, "clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical timers > >> when requested" should go via arm's tree, right ? > > > > If I'm reading Olof's irc-comments from yesterday correctly, that is right > > and the 3 patches should go in together: > > > > - "clocksource: arch_timer: Fix code to use physical timers > > > > when requested" fixes the use of physical timers in general > > > > - "clocksource: arch_timer: Allow the device tree to specify uninitialized > > > > timer registers" allows this to be set from dt > > > > - "ARM: dts: rk3288: add arm,cpu-registers-not-fw-configured" enables this > > on> > > rk3288 > > Ok, then I drop them from my tree and will let Olof to handle them.
But maybe you could give them an Ack :-)
Heiko
| |