lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: thunderbolt: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function call "ring_free"
From
Date
On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 15:14 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> 2. Are any additional prefixes appropriate so that further name space
> >> conflicts can be better avoided?
> >
> > To avoid possible external naming conflicts, add tb_ prefix to
> > various ring_<foo> structs and functions.
>
> Do you imagine that any XEN software developers need also to reconsider
> this implementation detail?
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/drivers/char/tpm/xen-tpmfront.c?id=fc14f9c1272f62c3e8d01300f52467c0d9af50f9#n268

I think static functions can be named whatever
the developer chooses.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-11-23 17:01    [W:0.979 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site