lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] i2c: slave-eeprom: add eeprom simulator driver
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 08:19:41AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello Wolfram,
>
> this mail is thematically more a reply to patch 1 and maybe just serves
> my understanding of the slave support.
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 05:04:54PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> >
> > The first user of the i2c-slave interface is an eeprom simulator. It is
> > a shared memory which can be accessed by the remote master via I2C and
> > locally via sysfs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since RFC:
> > * fix build error for modules
> > * don't hardcode size
> > * add boundary checks for sysfs access
> > * use a spinlock
> > * s/at24s/eeprom/g
> > * add some docs
> > * clean up exit paths
> > * use size-variable instead of driver_data
> >
> > drivers/i2c/Kconfig | 10 +++
> > drivers/i2c/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-eeprom.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 181 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-eeprom.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/Kconfig
> > index b51a402752c4..8c9e619f3026 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/Kconfig
> > @@ -110,6 +110,16 @@ config I2C_STUB
> >
> > If you don't know what to do here, definitely say N.
> >
> > +config I2C_SLAVE
> > + bool "I2C slave support"
> > +
> > +if I2C_SLAVE
> > +
> > +config I2C_SLAVE_EEPROM
> > + tristate "I2C eeprom slave driver"
> > +
> > +endif
> > +
> > config I2C_DEBUG_CORE
> > bool "I2C Core debugging messages"
> > help
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/Makefile
> > index 1722f50f2473..45095b3d16a9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/Makefile
> > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV) += i2c-dev.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_MUX) += i2c-mux.o
> > obj-y += algos/ busses/ muxes/
> > obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_STUB) += i2c-stub.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE_EEPROM) += i2c-slave-eeprom.o
> >
> > ccflags-$(CONFIG_I2C_DEBUG_CORE) := -DDEBUG
> > CFLAGS_i2c-core.o := -Wno-deprecated-declarations
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-eeprom.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-eeprom.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..6631400b5f02
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-slave-eeprom.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
> > +/*
> > + * I2C slave mode EEPROM simulator
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2014 by Wolfram Sang, Sang Engineering <wsa@sang-engineering.com>
> > + * Copyright (C) 2014 by Renesas Electronics Corporation
> > + *
> > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> > + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
> > + * Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
> > + *
> > + * Because most IP blocks can only detect one I2C slave address anyhow, this
> > + * driver does not support simulating EEPROM types which take more than one
> > + * address. It is prepared to simulate bigger EEPROMs with an internal 16 bit
> > + * pointer, yet implementation is deferred until the need actually arises.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> > +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
> > +
> > +struct eeprom_data {
> > + struct bin_attribute bin;
> > + bool first_write;
> > + spinlock_t buffer_lock;
> > + u8 buffer_idx;
> > + u8 buffer[];
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int i2c_slave_eeprom_slave_cb(struct i2c_client *client,
> > + enum i2c_slave_event event, u8 *val)
> > +{
> > + struct eeprom_data *eeprom = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > +
> > + switch (event) {
> > + case I2C_SLAVE_REQ_WRITE_END:
> > + if (eeprom->first_write) {
> > + eeprom->buffer_idx = *val;
> > + eeprom->first_write = false;
> > + } else {
> > + spin_lock(&eeprom->buffer_lock);
> > + eeprom->buffer[eeprom->buffer_idx++] = *val;
> > + spin_unlock(&eeprom->buffer_lock);
> > + }
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case I2C_SLAVE_REQ_READ_START:
> > + spin_lock(&eeprom->buffer_lock);
> > + *val = eeprom->buffer[eeprom->buffer_idx];
> > + spin_unlock(&eeprom->buffer_lock);
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case I2C_SLAVE_REQ_READ_END:
> > + eeprom->buffer_idx++;
> You don't check here for buffer_idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(buffer)?
> Ditto in the I2C_SLAVE_REQ_WRITE_END case.
I just noticed that buffer_idx is an u8, so it overflows at 255+1. So
the probe routine should error out if size is bigger than 256.

Best regards
Uwe

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-11-21 16:01    [W:0.131 / U:0.684 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site