Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 18 Nov 2014 10:04:33 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] regulator: Ensure unique regulator debugfs directory names |
| |
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:18:44PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Sorry, I have no idea how you expect me (and others) to handle situations > like this, much less with this patch. Please keep in mind that this is > a per-maintainer process, and each maintainer handles things differently. > Individual maintainers may expect me to send a ping like I did, or to > resend the patch, or they may not reply because they dislike the patch
The default process is to resend the patch; I'm sure there are some people who won't like that for some reason but it's reasonably rare.
> and they don't want to be bothered with a discussion. Some even go > ballistic if they get an e-mail with more than 80 columns of text.
That's going to annoy essentially everyone, some people will be more vocal than others but it's just a pretty basic thin.
> I can't even find out by browsing the regulator mailing list since it > appears that there is no such list.
lkml. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |