Messages in this thread | | | From | Namhyung Kim <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/23 v4] tracing/uprobes: Do not use return values of trace_seq_printf() | Date | Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:32:37 +0900 |
| |
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:14:29 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Here's the new patch: > > -- Steve > > From cd883b4c2d5d68ec598d6c6a3b5dce4dd99a4cc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org> > Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 17:26:57 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] tracing/uprobes: Do not use return values of > trace_seq_printf() > > The functions trace_seq_printf() and friends will soon no longer have > return values. Using trace_seq_has_overflowed() and trace_handle_return() > should be used instead. > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141114011411.693008134@goodmis.org > > Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> > Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Thanks, Namhyung
> --- > kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 23 ++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c > index e35327c787f7..fd76f8e108ef 100644 > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c > @@ -852,16 +852,14 @@ print_uprobe_event(struct trace_iterator *iter, int flags, struct trace_event *e > tu = container_of(event, struct trace_uprobe, tp.call.event); > > if (is_ret_probe(tu)) { > - if (!trace_seq_printf(s, "%s: (0x%lx <- 0x%lx)", > - ftrace_event_name(&tu->tp.call), > - entry->vaddr[1], entry->vaddr[0])) > - goto partial; > + trace_seq_printf(s, "%s: (0x%lx <- 0x%lx)", > + ftrace_event_name(&tu->tp.call), > + entry->vaddr[1], entry->vaddr[0]); > data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, true); > } else { > - if (!trace_seq_printf(s, "%s: (0x%lx)", > - ftrace_event_name(&tu->tp.call), > - entry->vaddr[0])) > - goto partial; > + trace_seq_printf(s, "%s: (0x%lx)", > + ftrace_event_name(&tu->tp.call), > + entry->vaddr[0]); > data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false); > } > > @@ -869,14 +867,13 @@ print_uprobe_event(struct trace_iterator *iter, int flags, struct trace_event *e > struct probe_arg *parg = &tu->tp.args[i]; > > if (!parg->type->print(s, parg->name, data + parg->offset, entry)) > - goto partial; > + goto out; > } > > - if (trace_seq_putc(s, '\n')) > - return TRACE_TYPE_HANDLED; > + trace_seq_putc(s, '\n'); > > -partial: > - return TRACE_TYPE_PARTIAL_LINE; > + out: > + return trace_handle_return(s); > } > > typedef bool (*filter_func_t)(struct uprobe_consumer *self,
| |