lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRE: [PATCH] carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
> From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@perches.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 1:33 PM
> To: Wang, Yalin
> Cc: 'chunkeey@googlemail.com'; 'linville@tuxdriver.com'; 'linux-
> wireless@vger.kernel.org'; 'netdev@vger.kernel.org'; 'linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org'
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
>
> On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 13:16 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
> >
> > This allows some architectures with hardware instructions for bit
> > reversals to eliminate the array.
>
> This one is already in -next
>
> commit 7a1283d8f5298437a454ec477384dcd9f9f88bac
> Author: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Date: Tue Oct 28 14:18:58 2014 -0700
>
> carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
>
> Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
>
> This allows some architectures with hardware instructions
> for bit reversals to eliminate the array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
>
Got it ,
So I need wait for your another patch to be accepted.

Thanks!


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-11-14 07:01    [W:0.038 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site