Messages in this thread | | | From | "Wang, Yalin" <> | Date | Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:37:39 +0800 | Subject | RE: [PATCH] carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8 |
| |
> From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@perches.com] > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 1:33 PM > To: Wang, Yalin > Cc: 'chunkeey@googlemail.com'; 'linville@tuxdriver.com'; 'linux- > wireless@vger.kernel.org'; 'netdev@vger.kernel.org'; 'linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org' > Subject: Re: [PATCH] carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8 > > On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 13:16 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote: > > Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array. > > > > This allows some architectures with hardware instructions for bit > > reversals to eliminate the array. > > This one is already in -next > > commit 7a1283d8f5298437a454ec477384dcd9f9f88bac > Author: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> > Date: Tue Oct 28 14:18:58 2014 -0700 > > carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8 > > Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array. > > This allows some architectures with hardware instructions > for bit reversals to eliminate the array. > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> > Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> > Got it , So I need wait for your another patch to be accepted.
Thanks!
| |