Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 12 Nov 2014 12:05:49 +0000 | From | Russell King - ARM Linux <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] ptrace: add generic SET_SYSCALL request |
| |
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:19:26PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 12 November 2014 11:13:52 Will Deacon wrote: > > Just do arm64. We already have the dedicated request for arch/arm/. > > I wonder if we should define NT_ARM64_SYSTEM_CALL to the same value > as NT_S390_SYSTEM_CALL (0x307), or even define it as an architecture- > independent NT_SYSTEM_CALL number with that value, so other architectures > don't have to introduce new types when they also want to implement it.
That would be a sane thing to do, so that tools which want to get at this information can do in an almost standardised way for architectures implementing this method.
-- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.
|  |