[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] ptrace: add generic SET_SYSCALL request
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:19:26PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 November 2014 11:13:52 Will Deacon wrote:
> > Just do arm64. We already have the dedicated request for arch/arm/.
> I wonder if we should define NT_ARM64_SYSTEM_CALL to the same value
> as NT_S390_SYSTEM_CALL (0x307), or even define it as an architecture-
> independent NT_SYSTEM_CALL number with that value, so other architectures
> don't have to introduce new types when they also want to implement it.

That would be a sane thing to do, so that tools which want to get at
this information can do in an almost standardised way for architectures
implementing this method.

FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to

 \ /
  Last update: 2014-11-12 13:41    [W:0.075 / U:2.704 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site