lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] Support PMIC operation region for CrystalCove and XPower
Date
On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 11:11:52 AM Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Aaron Lu wrote:
>
> > On 10/31/2014 02:08 PM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > On Intel Baytrail-T and Baytrail-T-CR platforms, there are two customized
> > > ACPI operation regions defined for the Power Management Integrated Circuit
> > > device, one is for power resource handling and one is for thermal: sensor
> > > temperature reporting, trip point setting, etc. There are different PMIC
> > > chips used on those platforms and though each has the same two operation
> > > regions and functionality, their implementation is different so every PMIC
> > > will need a driver. But since their functionality is similar, some common
> > > code is abstracted into the intel_soc_pmic_opregion.c.
> > >
> > > The last version is posted here:
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/8/801
> > >
> > > Changes since then:
> > > 1 Move to drivers/acpi as discussed on the above thread;
> > > 2 Added support for XPower AXP288 PMIC operation region support;
> > > 3 Since operation region handler can not be removed(at the moment at least),
> > > use bool for the two operation region driver configs instead of tristate;
> > > Another reason to do this is that, with Mika's MFD ACPI support patch, all
> > > those MFD cell devices created will have the same modalias as their parent's
> > > so it doesn't make much sense to compile these drivers into modules.
> > >
> > > Patch 1 applies on top of Rafael's pm-next branch, and then patch 2 and
> > > patch 3 needs merge of Lee's mfd/ib-mfd-iio-3.19 branch where the PMIC
> > > driver XPower AXP288 and iio driver axp288_adc is located.
> >
> > Since patch 2-3 are based on top of the mfd/ib-mfd-iio-3.19 branch, it
> > would be easy to go through the mfd/ib-mfd-iio-3.19 branch.
> >
> > Rafael,
> > Can I get your ACK for the three patches?
> >
> > Lee,
> > Can you please take the series if Rafael gives it ack?
>
> Yes, no problem.

Well, since the code is going to reside mostly in drivers/acpi, I think I should
be applying the patches and from your response it looks like you are fine with
them. Is that correct?

Rafael



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-11-12 00:41    [W:0.067 / U:3.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site