lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/7] pinctrl: zynq: Document DT binding
From
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Soren Brinkmann
<soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote:

> Add documentation for the devicetree binding for the Zynq pincontroller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
(...)
> +Example:
> + pinctrl0: pinctrl@700 {
> + compatible = "xlnx,pinctrl-zynq";
> + reg = <0x700 0x200>;
> + syscon = <&slcr>;
> +
> + pinctrl_uart1_default: pinctrl-uart1-default {
> + common {
> + groups = "uart1_10_grp";
> + function = "uart1";
> + slew-rate = <0>;
> + io-standard = <1>;
> + };

I don't really like that you mix multiplexing and config in the
same node. I would prefer if the generic bindings say we have
muxing nodes and config nodes, and those are disparate.

Can't you just split this:

common-mux {
groups = "uart1_10_grp";
function = "uart1";
};

common-config {
groups = "uart1_10_grp";
slew-rate = <0>;
io-standard = <1>;
};

That way we can identify nodes as mux nodes (have "function")
or config nodes (have "groups" or "pins" but not "function") which
I think makes things easier to read.

Yours,
Linus Walleij


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-11-11 16:41    [W:0.255 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site