lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 3.17 167/319] drm/i915: intel_backlight scale() math WA
Date
3.17-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "U. Artie Eoff" <ullysses.a.eoff@intel.com>

commit 673e7bbdb3920b62cfc6c710bea626b0a9b0f43a upstream.

Improper truncated integer division in the scale() function causes
actual_brightness != brightness. This (partial) work-around should be
sufficient for a majority of use-cases, but it is by no means a complete
solution.

TODO: Determine how best to scale "user" values to "hw" values, and
vice-versa, when the ranges are of different sizes. That would be a
buggy scenario even with this work-around.

The issue was introduced in the following (v3.17-rc1) commit:

6dda730 drm/i915: respect the VBT minimum backlight brightness

Note that for easier backporting this commit adds a duplicated macro.
A follow-up cleanup patch rectifies this for 3.18+

v2: (thanks to Chris Wilson) clarify commit message, use rounded division
macro

v3: -DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() fails to build with CONFIG_X86_32=y. (Jani)
-Use DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL() instead. (Damien)
-v1 and v2 originally authored by Joe Konno.

Signed-off-by: U. Artie Eoff <ullysses.a.eoff@intel.com>
Reviewed-By: Joe Konno <joe.konno@intel.com>
[danvet: Add backporting note.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
@@ -398,6 +398,9 @@ intel_panel_detect(struct drm_device *de
}
}

+#define DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(ll, d) \
+({ unsigned long long _tmp = (ll)+(d)/2; do_div(_tmp, d); _tmp; })
+
/**
* scale - scale values from one range to another
*
@@ -419,9 +422,8 @@ static uint32_t scale(uint32_t source_va
source_val = clamp(source_val, source_min, source_max);

/* avoid overflows */
- target_val = (uint64_t)(source_val - source_min) *
- (target_max - target_min);
- do_div(target_val, source_max - source_min);
+ target_val = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((uint64_t)(source_val - source_min) *
+ (target_max - target_min), source_max - source_min);
target_val += target_min;

return target_val;



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-11-12 02:41    [W:1.036 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site