lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 3/3] efi: Capsule update with user helper interface
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Kweh, Hock Leong
<hock.leong.kweh@intel.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andy Lutomirski [mailto:luto@amacapital.net]
>> > #!/bin/sh
>> >
>> > old=$(cat
>> > /sys/devices/platform/efi_capsule_user_helper/capsule_loaded)
>> >
>> > for arg in "$@"
>> > do
>> > if [ -f $arg ]
>> > then
>> > echo 1 > /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/loading
>> > cat $arg > /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/data
>> > echo 0 > /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/loading
>>
>> I think you have a race. Try putting msleep(1000) after the
>> request_firmware_nowait call, and I bet this will fail on the second try.
>
> Sorry for the late response. I don't really catch the race condition that
> you are referring? Are you trying to tell that the user script could run faster
> before the previous callback function actually end? Will such scenario happen?
> In the callback function, after the request_firmware_nowait(), I don't have
> any codes will delay the callback function to end. Besides, there is a mutex_lock
> protecting the request_firmware_nowait() calling. Won't that take care of the
> issue?

In callbackfn_efi_capsule, you call request_firmware_nowait. When
that callback is invoked, I think that the
/sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file directory doesn't exist at all.
If the callback takes longer than it takes your script to make it
through a full iteration, then it will try uploading the second
capsule before the firmware class directory is there, so it will fail.

But I just realized that your script has a loop below to handle that.
It's this:

oldtime=$(date +%S)
oldtime=$(((time + 2) % 60))
until [ -f /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/loading ]
do
newtime=$(date +%S)
if [ $newtime -eq $oldtime ]
then
break
fi
done

Aside from the fact that this loop itself is racy (it may loop forever
if something goes wrong in the kernel, since $newtime -eq $oldtime may
never happen), it should help, if you're lucky. But there's another
bug.

>>
>> I think that firmware_class doesn't call the callback until after loading is closed
>> for the second time. If so, then this is racy. Try inserting msleep(1000) at the
>> beginning of your callback and uploading a capsule that should load
>> successfully -- this will report failure, but a future upload may get very
>> confused. Also, what does the firmware class do when simultaneous
>> uploads of the same file with different contents are in flight? Is that possible?
>
> Sorry again, I can't really catch you on this race condition statement. Are you
> trying to tell if user is doing this:
>
> echo 1 > /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/loading
> cat capsule1 > /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/data
> cat capsule2 > /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/data
> echo 0 > /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/loading
>
> If so, capsule2 will be the one we will obtain in the callback function.

Here's the race:

User:
echo 1 > /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/loading
cat capsule1 > /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/data
echo 0 > /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/loading

Kernel: Be a little slow here due to preemption or whatever.

User:
-f /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/loading returns true
capsules_loaded == 0
Assume failure, incorrectly

Kernel: catch up and increment capsules_loaded.

If these patches get applied, then I think that the protocol needs to
be documented in Documentation/ABI. It should say something like:

To upload an EFI capsule, do this:

Write 1 to /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/loading
Write the capsule to /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/data
Write 0 to /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file/loading

Make sure that /sys/class/firmware/efi-capsule-file disappears and
comes back, perhaps by cd-ing there and waiting for all the files in
the directory to go away.

Then, and only then, read capsules_loaded to detect success.


Once you've written that doc, please seriously consider whether this
interface is justifiable. I think it sucks.

--Andy


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-11-10 21:01    [W:0.051 / U:3.688 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site