Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 28 Oct 2014 17:06:44 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: add xtensa xtfpga I2S interface and platform |
| |
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 05:39:13PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 10/28/2014 05:04 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >Is that going to play nicely with the fact that the interrupt can be > >shared and the desire to (AFAICT) do NAPI style stuff with the interrupt > >disabled for long periods?
> Threaded interrupts got support for interrupt sharing a while ago, so I > guess yes. I think it will even work better than the tasklet approach. You > can configure the IRQ to disable itself as long as the thread is running.
I know you *can* share threaded interrupts, I'm just not sure that hogging the threaded handler plays nicely with other users. Though now I look at this again tx_fifo_high is a "constant" so it's not actually trying to do a NAPI type mitigation thing and this is really just an open coded threaded interrupt as you say. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |