lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 1/3] power-domain: add power domain drivers for Rockchip platform
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:44:31AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Jinkun,
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:29:19AM -0700, jinkun.hong wrote:
> > +static int rockchip_pd_power(struct rockchip_domain *pd, bool power_on)
> > +{
> > + int ret = 0;
> > + struct rockchip_dev_entry *de;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&pd->dev_lock);
> > + /* no clk, set power domain will fail */
> > + if (list_empty(&pd->dev_list)) {
> > + pr_err("%s: no devices in %s power domain\n", __func__,
> > + pd->base.name);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(de, &pd->dev_list, node) {
> > + pm_clk_resume(de->dev);
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = rockchip_pmu_set_power_domain(pd, power_on);
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(de, &pd->dev_list, node) {
> > + pm_clk_suspend(de->dev);
> > + }
> > +out:
> > + mutex_unlock(&pd->dev_lock);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> For my education, could you please tell me why we need to enable all
> clocks of all devices in a power domain when we are talking to the PMU
> and then turn them immediately off? Would not we want to enable clocks
> in start()) callbacks, like Ulf mentioned?

Jinkun, any update on this question?

Thanks.

--
Dmitry


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-28 01:01    [W:0.056 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site