lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] futex: fix a race condition between REQUEUE_PI and task death
On Sat, 25 Oct 2014, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> > pi_state_free and exit_pi_state_list both clean up futex_pi_state's.
> > exit_pi_state_list takes the hb lock first, and most callers of
> > pi_state_free do too. requeue_pi didn't, which causes lots of problems.
>
> "causes lots of problems" is not really a good explanation of the root
> cause. That wants a proper description of the race, i.e.
>
> CPU 0 CPU 1
> ... ....
>
> I'm surely someone who is familiar with that code, but it took me
> quite some time to understand whats going on. The casual reader will
> just go into brain spiral mode and give up.

Thinking about it again, I'm no longer so sure that exit_pi_state_list is the
only place that it can race against. However, I did catch that one with a
particularly lucky crashdump, so I know it _can_ happen there. Is just
giving an example for that good?

> > static void free_pi_state(struct futex_pi_state *pi_state)
>
> > @@ -1558,6 +1552,14 @@ retry_private:
> > ret = get_futex_value_locked(&curval, uaddr1);
> >
> > if (unlikely(ret)) {
> > + if (flags & FLAGS_SHARED && pi_state != NULL) {
>
> Why is this dependend on "flags & FLAGS_SHARED"? The shared/private
> property has nothing to do with that at all, but I might be missing
> something.

Nothing... Good catch. It was a bad rebase.

Thanks,

Brian


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-26 02:01    [W:0.140 / U:0.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site