lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: cma: split cma-reserved in dmesg log
Date
On Wed, Oct 22 2014, Pintu Kumar wrote:
> When the system boots up, in the dmesg logs we can see
> the memory statistics along with total reserved as below.
> Memory: 458840k/458840k available, 65448k reserved, 0K highmem
>
> When CMA is enabled, still the total reserved memory remains the same.
> However, the CMA memory is not considered as reserved.
> But, when we see /proc/meminfo, the CMA memory is part of free memory.
> This creates confusion.
> This patch corrects the problem by properly subtracting the CMA reserved
> memory from the total reserved memory in dmesg logs.
>
> Below is the dmesg snapshot from an arm based device with 512MB RAM and
> 12MB single CMA region.
>
> Before this change:
> Memory: 458840k/458840k available, 65448k reserved, 0K highmem
>
> After this change:
> Memory: 458840k/458840k available, 53160k reserved, 12288k cma-reserved, 0K highmem
>
> Signed-off-by: Pintu Kumar <pintu.k@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Pratap Singh <vishnu.ps@samsung.com>

Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>


I'm not sure how Andrew would think about it, and I don't have strong
feelings, but I would consider a few changes:

> ---
> v2: Moved totalcma_pages extern declaration to linux/cma.h
> Removed CONFIG_CMA while show cma-reserved, from page_alloc.c
> Moved totalcma_pages declaration to page_alloc.c, so that if will be visible
> in non-CMA cases.
> include/linux/cma.h | 1 +
> mm/cma.c | 1 +
> mm/page_alloc.c | 6 ++++--
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cma.h b/include/linux/cma.h
> index 0430ed0..0b75896 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cma.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cma.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>
> struct cma;
>
> +extern unsigned long totalcma_pages;

+#ifdef CONFIG_CMA
+extern unsigned long totalcma_pages;
+#else
+# define totalcma_pages 0UL
+#endif

> extern phys_addr_t cma_get_base(struct cma *cma);
> extern unsigned long cma_get_size(struct cma *cma);
>
> diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
> index 963bc4a..8435762 100644
> --- a/mm/cma.c
> +++ b/mm/cma.c
> @@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_addr_t base,
> if (ret)
> goto err;
>
> + totalcma_pages += (size / PAGE_SIZE);
> pr_info("Reserved %ld MiB at %08lx\n", (unsigned long)size / SZ_1M,
> (unsigned long)base);
> return 0;
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index dd73f9a..ababbd8 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(managed_page_count_lock);
>
> unsigned long totalram_pages __read_mostly;
> unsigned long totalreserve_pages __read_mostly;
> +unsigned long totalcma_pages __read_mostly;

Move this to cma.c.

> /*
> * When calculating the number of globally allowed dirty pages, there
> * is a certain number of per-zone reserves that should not be
> @@ -5520,7 +5521,7 @@ void __init mem_init_print_info(const char *str)
>
> pr_info("Memory: %luK/%luK available "
> "(%luK kernel code, %luK rwdata, %luK rodata, "
> - "%luK init, %luK bss, %luK reserved"
> + "%luK init, %luK bss, %luK reserved, %luK cma-reserved"
> #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
> ", %luK highmem"
> #endif
> @@ -5528,7 +5529,8 @@ void __init mem_init_print_info(const char *str)
> nr_free_pages() << (PAGE_SHIFT-10), physpages << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> codesize >> 10, datasize >> 10, rosize >> 10,
> (init_data_size + init_code_size) >> 10, bss_size >> 10,
> - (physpages - totalram_pages) << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> + (physpages - totalram_pages - totalcma_pages) << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> + totalcma_pages << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
> totalhigh_pages << (PAGE_SHIFT-10),
> #endif
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>

--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@google.com>--<xmpp:mina86@jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-23 19:41    [W:0.131 / U:0.708 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site