lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Fwd: [Proposal] PM sleep children of inactive I2C bus segments off Masters in multi-master systems
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:16:57PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:10:47PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe you can find an error code which with some level of confidence
> > > reflects "lost mastership". Then you can implement whatever makes sense
> > > for your use case in your user space application(s).
> >
> > We have a documented fault code for ArbitrationLost and that is -EAGAIN
> > (see Documentation/i2c/fault-codes). If a driver does use something
> > else, patches are very welcome.
> >
> > Other than that, I find this thread very confusing. Of course can
> > another master modify the clients, this is what multi-master is all
> > about, no?
> >
> That is the point I was trying to make in one of my earlier replies.

Yes, and I wondered why the thread continued after that, so I thought
I'll bring it up again :) No, seriously, I did not understand the reply
to that mail of yours, but I'll try again tomorrow after some sleep.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-10-02 00:01    [W:0.056 / U:1.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site