Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 9 Jan 2014 16:01:55 +0530 | From | Sekhar Nori <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for keystone arch |
| |
On Wednesday 08 January 2014 07:38 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Tuesday 07 January 2014 11:06 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Tuesday 07 January 2014 11:22 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> Sekhar, >>> >>> On Tuesday 24 December 2013 06:41 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >>>> This series is intended to update Davinci GPIO driver and reuse >>>> it for Keystone SoCs, because Keystone uses the similar GPIO IP like Davinci. >>>> Keystone GPIO IP: supports: >>>> - up to 32 GPIO lines; >>>> - only unbanked irqs; >>>> >>>> See Documentation: >>>> Keystone - http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf >>>> >>>> This series based on: >>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/nsekhar/linux-davinci.git/log/?h=v3.14/gpio >>>> >>>> Changes in v3: >>>> - fixed code, changed by mistake; fixed sparse warning >>>> Changes in v2: >>>> - minor comments applied, no functional changes >>>> >>>> v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/18/135 >>>> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/12/366 >>>> >>>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >>>> Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> >>>> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> >>>> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> >>>> >>>> Grygorii Strashko (2): >>>> gpio: davinci: don't create irq_domain in case of unbanked irqs >>>> gpio: davinci: reuse for Keystone SoC >>>> >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt | 4 +- >>>> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 82 ++++++++++++++------ >>>> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) >>>> >>> Have you picked up the $subject series in your queue ? >> >> Not yet, at least on the new compatible introduction, I need an ack from >> DT folks. >> > I noticed that but the usual 2 weeks period to get ack is over I guess ;-) > The DT part is really trivial as well but I let you decide.
I just realize that Rob's e-mail address bounces. I have added his updated address now and hopefully he will see this to provide his ack.
Rob,
We need your ack on 2/2 of this series. If you do not have the patch, I can forward it to you.
> >> I am happy with the patches though and have tested them as well, In case >> I do not get an ack from 2/2 in time, I can at least send 1/2 for >> inclusion after my first gpio pull request to ARM-SoC gets pulled. >> > Would be great to get both of them but if not both at least 1/2.
I had already sent it with my first pull request. Hmph. Everything except 2/2 of tis series should be in linux-next now.
Thanks, Sekhar
| |