Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:33:49 -0500 | From | Theodore Ts'o <> | Subject | Re: #pragma once? |
| |
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > Does anyone have any objection to the use of "#pragma once" instead of > the usual #ifndef-#define-...-#endif include guard? GCC, LLVM/clang, > and the latest Sparse all support either method just fine. (I added > support to Sparse myself.) Both have equivalent performance. "#pragma > once" is simpler, and avoids the possibility of a typo in the defined > guard symbol.
Does anybody know whether other static code analysis tools such as Coverity can handle #pragma once?
- Ted
| |