Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Jan 2014 20:52:22 +0200 | From | Ivaylo Dimitrov <> | Subject | Re: [BISECTED] OMAP: DSS: clk rate mismatch |
| |
On 29.01.2014 13:30, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 2014-01-28 20:17, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: >> >> >> On 28.01.2014 10:48, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> >>> I made a somewhat hacky quickfix for beagle. Applying that and the >>> clk-divider from the link above makes things work for me. However, as I >>> said, the issue with n900 might be different, but it'd be interesting to >>> hear if it has any effect. >>> >>> Tomi >>> >> >> Applying those 2 patches doesn't help, still get exactly the same warning. >> >> Find attached my clk_summary (with my hacky patch applied, otherwise I >> cannot boot the device) > > Can you try this one: > > From e511789f7be00beeeee0712910c60a57c51b2705 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> > Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:28:53 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] clkoutx2 fix > > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock3xxx_data.c | 7 +++++++ > arch/arm/mach-omap2/dpll3xxx.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+) >
Yep, that one fixes the problem. Thanks!
Now I only need to find why maemo is 10 times slower with linux-next compared to 3.13-rc7, but that is another story :).
Ivo
| |