lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH V3] max8925_power: Use "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)" for DT code.
From
Hi Tomasz,

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 27.01.2014 19:37, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
>>
>> Instead of "#ifdef CONFIG_OF" use "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)"
>> option for DT code to avoid if-deffery in code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manish Badarkhe <badarkhe.manish@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> :100644 100644 b4513f2... 3e54476... M drivers/power/max8925_power.c
>> drivers/power/max8925_power.c | 17 +++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/max8925_power.c b/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
>> index b4513f2..3e54476 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
>> @@ -427,7 +427,6 @@ static int max8925_deinit_charger(struct
>> max8925_power_info *info)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> static struct max8925_power_pdata *
>> max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> @@ -440,9 +439,6 @@ max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> int no_insert_detect;
>> struct max8925_power_pdata *pdata;
>>
>> - if (!nproot)
>> - return pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> -
>> np = of_find_node_by_name(nproot, "charger");
>> if (!np) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to find charger node\n");
>> @@ -468,13 +464,6 @@ max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> return pdata;
>> }
>> -#else
>> -static struct max8925_power_pdata *
>> -max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> -{
>> - return pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> -}
>> -#endif
>>
>> static int max8925_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> @@ -483,7 +472,11 @@ static int max8925_power_probe(struct platform_device
>> *pdev)
>> struct max8925_power_info *info;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - pdata = max8925_power_dt_init(pdev);
>> + pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>> +
>> + if (!pdata && chip->dev->of_node)
>
>
> Shouldn't IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) also be checked here to let the compiler
> throw max8925_power_dt_init() away if the condition always evaluates to
> false?

oops, I missed that. I will add it and repost patch.

Thanks
Manish Badarkhe


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-28 17:01    [W:8.986 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site