lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/9] ARM: get rid of arch_cpu_idle_prepare()
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 01:08:16AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > ARM and ARM64 are the only two architectures implementing
> > arch_cpu_idle_prepare() simply to call local_fiq_enable().
> >
> > We have secondary_start_kernel() already calling local_fiq_enable() and
> > this is done a second time in arch_cpu_idle_prepare() in that case. And
> > enabling FIQs has nothing to do with idling the CPU to start with.
> >
> > So let's introduce init_fiq_boot_cpu() to take care of FIQs on the boot
> > CPU and remove arch_cpu_idle_prepare(). This is now done a bit earlier
> > at late_initcall time but this shouldn't make a difference in practice
> > i.e. when FIQs are actually used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 5 -----
> > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 7 +++++++
> > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
> > index 92f7b15dd2..725b8c95e0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c
> > @@ -142,11 +142,6 @@ static void default_idle(void)
> > local_irq_enable();
> > }
> >
> > -void arch_cpu_idle_prepare(void)
> > -{
> > - local_fiq_enable();
> > -}
> > -
> > void arch_cpu_idle_enter(void)
> > {
> > ledtrig_cpu(CPU_LED_IDLE_START);
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> > index 987a7f5bce..d027b1a6fe 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> > @@ -789,6 +789,13 @@ static int __init init_machine_late(void)
> > }
> > late_initcall(init_machine_late);
> >
> > +static int __init init_fiq_boot_cpu(void)
> > +{
> > + local_fiq_enable();
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +late_initcall(init_fiq_boot_cpu);
>
> arch_cpu_idle_prepare() gets called from the swapper thread, and changes
> the swapper thread's CPSR. init_fiq_boot_cpu() gets called from PID1, the
> init thread, and changes the init thread's CPSR, which will already have
> FIQs enabled by way of how kernel threads are created.
>
> Hence, the above code fragment has no effect what so ever, and those
> platforms using FIQs will not have FIQs delivered if they're idle
> (because the swapper will have FIQs masked at the CPU.)

You're right.

What about moving local_fiq_enable() to trap_init() then?


Nicolas


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-27 17:21    [W:0.114 / U:0.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site