Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:08:09 -0800 (PST) | From | David Rientjes <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs access to memory reserves |
| |
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Greg Kroah-Hartmann wrote:
> > The patches getting proposed through -mm for stable boggles my mind > > sometimes. > > Do you have any objections to patches that I have taken for -stable? If > so, please let me know. >
You've haven't taken the ones that I outlined in http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=138580717728759, so I'm happy that those could be prevented. I'm identifying another patch here that is pending in -mm that obviously violates the stable kernel rules and I don't believe it should be annotated in a way that you'll scoop it up later.
The patch in question hasn't been tested by anybody and I don't think you want such things to ever be merged into a stable kernel series.
| |