lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/2] cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq driver depends on SOC_IMX6Q/SOC_IMX6SL
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 06:39:52PM -0800, John Tobias wrote:
> The ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ, HAVE_IMX_ANATOP and PM_OPP are moved up to ARCH_MCX.
> The driver should show if the SOC_IMX6Q and/or SOC_IMX6SL is/are selected.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Tobias <john.tobias.ph@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> index 3ba5dcc..230c663 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ config ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ
>
> config ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ
> tristate "Freescale i.MX6 cpufreq support"
> - depends on ARCH_MXC
> + depends on SOC_IMX6Q || SOC_IMX6SL

No. We do not want to touch this line where there is another IMX6xx can
reuse the driver. Depending on ARCH_MXC is good enough, since we
already have the symbol prompt and help text to tell the targets that
the driver supports.

Shawn

> depends on REGULATOR_ANATOP
> help
> This adds cpufreq driver support for Freescale i.MX6 series SoCs.
> --
> 1.8.3.2
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-01-13 05:01    [W:0.216 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site