lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/1] dcache: Translating dentry into pathname without taking rename_lock
On 09/09/2013 01:29 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 12:18:13PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * read_seqbegin_or_lock - begin a sequence number check or locking block
>> + * lock: sequence lock
>> + * seq : sequence number to be checked
>> + *
>> + * First try it once optimistically without taking the lock. If that fails,
>> + * take the lock. The sequence number is also used as a marker for deciding
>> + * whether to be a reader (even) or writer (odd).
>> + * N.B. seq must be initialized to an even number to begin with.
>> + */
>> +static inline void read_seqbegin_or_lock(seqlock_t *lock, int *seq)
>> +{
>> + if (!(*seq& 1)) { /* Even */
>> + *seq = read_seqbegin(lock);
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + } else /* Odd */
>> + write_seqlock(lock);
>> +}
>> +static inline int read_seqretry_or_unlock(seqlock_t *lock, int *seq)
>> +{
>> + if (!(*seq& 1)) { /* Even */
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> + if (read_seqretry(lock, *seq)) {
>> + (*seq)++; /* Take writer lock */
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> + } else /* Odd */
>> + write_sequnlock(lock);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
> I'm not sure I like mixing rcu_read_lock() into that - d_path() and friends
> can do that themselves just fine (it needs to be taken when seq is even),
> and e.g. d_walk() doesn't need it at all. Other than that, I'm OK with
> this variant.

I think rcu_read_lock() is needed to make sure that the dentry won't be
freed as we don't take d_lock now.

-Longman


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-09 20:01    [W:0.181 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site