Messages in this thread | | | From | David Howells <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv4 0/5] ceph: persistent caching with fscache | Date | Wed, 04 Sep 2013 16:49:13 +0100 |
| |
Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com> wrote:
> David, are the fscache patches here ready for the next merge window? Do > you have a preference for whose tree they go through?
There's only one problem - patch 1 needs to come _after_ patch 2 to avoid breaking git bisect. Plus these patches 2 and 4 extend the fscache API without adjusting the documentation - but that can be added later.
And I think Milosz deserves a beer (or other poison of his choice;-) for finding a longstanding irritating bug.
I think AFS, CIFS, NFS and 9P all need patching too, but I can attend to that.
Should I take the patches through my tree? Then I can make the adjustments.
David
| |