lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: OCFS2: ocfs2_read_blocks:285 ERROR: block 532737 had the JBD bit set while I was in lock_buffer!
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 08:42:37AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Am 03.09.2013 05:17, schrieb Jeff Liu:
> > Hello,
> >
> > It seems like Sunil has fixed a similar issue against ocfs2-1.4
> > several years ago:
> > https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=2fd250839d0f5073af8d42e97f1db74beb621674;hp=e882faf84930431524f84598caea7d4e9a9529c5
> > https://oss.oracle.com/git/?p=ocfs2-1.4.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=eccff85213d4c2762f787d9e7cb1503042ba75b9;hp=edc147473ffd9c03790dc4502b893823f44a9ec4
> >
> > The old bug ticket for the discussion:
> > https://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1235
> >
> > This fix is specifically for ocfs2-1.4, but Mark once mentioned that
> > the BUG() there can be removed if we have a good explanation for this
> > sort of behavior, is it time to have it in mainline?
>
> Hmm, not fun.
> In my case I'm not using NFS or any other network filesystem.
> The OCFS2 is also used in local mode (no cluster).
>
> What really worries me is that this another proof that Oracles OCFS2 branch is out of sync with mainline.

Can you show me what branch you are talking about here?
--Mark

--
Mark Fasheh


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-03 19:41    [W:0.056 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site