| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [ 01/71] PCI / ACPI / PM: Clear pme_poll for devices in D3cold on wakeup | Date | Sun, 29 Sep 2013 12:27:13 -0700 |
| |
3.11-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
commit 834145156bedadfb50121f0bc5e9d9f9f942bcca upstream.
Commit 448bd85 (PCI/PM: add PCIe runtime D3cold support) added a piece of code to pci_acpi_wake_dev() causing that function to behave in a special way for devices in D3cold (so that their configuration registers are not accessed before those devices are resumed). However, it didn't take the clearing of the pme_poll flag into account. That has to be done for all devices, even if they are in D3cold, or pci_pme_list_scan() will not know that wakeup has been signaled for the device and will poll its PME Status bit unnecessarily.
Fix the problem by moving the clearing of the pme_poll flag in pci_acpi_wake_dev() before the code introduced by commit 448bd85.
Reported-and-tested-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
--- drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ static void pci_acpi_wake_dev(acpi_handl if (event != ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE || !pci_dev) return; + if (pci_dev->pme_poll) + pci_dev->pme_poll = false; + if (pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D3cold) { pci_wakeup_event(pci_dev); pm_runtime_resume(&pci_dev->dev); @@ -57,9 +60,6 @@ static void pci_acpi_wake_dev(acpi_handl if (pci_dev->pme_support) pci_check_pme_status(pci_dev); - if (pci_dev->pme_poll) - pci_dev->pme_poll = false; - pci_wakeup_event(pci_dev); pm_runtime_resume(&pci_dev->dev);
|