lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] UBI: fastmap: fix backward compatibility with image_seq
2013/9/27 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>:
> Am 27.09.2013 14:51, schrieb Richard Genoud:
>> Some old UBI implementations (e.g. U-Boot) have not implemented the image
>> sequence feature.
>> So, when erase blocks are written, the image sequence in the ec header
>> is lost (set to zero).
>> UBI scan_all() takes this case into account (commits
>> 32bc4820287a1a03982979515949e8ea56eac641 and
>> 2eadaad67b2b6bd132eda105128d2d466298b8e3)
>>
>> But fastmap scan functions (ubi_scan_fastmap() and scan_pool()) didn't.
>>
>> This patch fixes the issue.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
>> ---
>
> W00t! Good catch!
>
> Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Thanks :)


There's still an error when the image sequence is bad:
[ 35.632812] UBI error: scan_pool: bad image seq: 0x0, expected: 0x6e452f03
[ 35.640625] UBI error: ubi_scan_fastmap: Attach by fastmap failed,
doing a full scan!
[ 35.648437] kmem_cache_destroy ubi_ainf_peb_slab: Slab cache still
has objects <- the destroy_ai in line 1415
[ 35.656250] CPU: 0 PID: 486 Comm: ubiattach Not tainted 3.11.1 #38
[ 35.656250] [<c001283c>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xe0) from
[<c0010a24>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[ 35.671875] [<c0010a24>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) from [<c019b9e4>]
(destroy_ai+0x230/0x244)
[ 35.679687] [<c019b9e4>] (destroy_ai+0x230/0x244) from [<c019d334>]
(ubi_attach+0x1f8/0x390)
[ 35.687500] [<c019d334>] (ubi_attach+0x1f8/0x390) from [<c0191a18>]
(ubi_attach_mtd_dev+0x2b8/0x86c)
[ 35.695312] [<c0191a18>] (ubi_attach_mtd_dev+0x2b8/0x86c) from
[<c0192208>] (ctrl_cdev_ioctl+0xd0/0x184)
[ 35.703125] [<c0192208>] (ctrl_cdev_ioctl+0xd0/0x184) from
[<c007ef4c>] (vfs_ioctl+0x28/0x3c)
[ 35.710937] [<c007ef4c>] (vfs_ioctl+0x28/0x3c) from [<c007f974>]
(do_vfs_ioctl+0x4e8/0x54c)
[ 35.718750] [<c007f974>] (do_vfs_ioctl+0x4e8/0x54c) from
[<c007fa0c>] (SyS_ioctl+0x34/0x58)
[ 35.726562] [<c007fa0c>] (SyS_ioctl+0x34/0x58) from [<c000e3c0>]
(ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x2c)

I'll look into that

Richard


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-27 18:21    [W:0.049 / U:9.468 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site