Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:58:08 -0700 | From | David Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv4 2/3] ARM: msm: Add support for APQ8074 Dragonboard |
| |
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:33:53PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> "ePAPR 1.1 section 2.2.1.1 "Node Name Requirements" specifies that any >> node that has a reg property must include a unit address in its name >> with value matching the first entry in its reg property. Conversely, if >> a node does not have a reg property, the node name must not include a >> unit address." >> >> The soc node we have does not have a reg property ? > >Not 100% sure what people will decide on this. There are a number of >examples on the PPC side (arch/powerpc/boot/dts) that are soc@ADDR, >but they don't typically have "reg" properties at the soc level. > >Let's go ahead w/o the unit address (as you have it) for now.
What is the address even supposed to mean? Are we expecting multiple 'soc' nodes?
David
| |