[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] stable_kernel_rules.txt: Exclude networking from stable rules
On Sun, 2013-09-22 at 11:51 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This is also the preferred way to do it for XFS. Maybe word it in a way
> that we can easily add subsystems.
> To me it generally seems to be the best way to do it - having random Ccs
> and lots of stable trees doesn't seem like a very good way of handling
> it.

Maybe adding a mechanism to MAINTAINERS would be better.
Maybe a default B: (backport?) of
with a per-subsystem override?

M: maintainer@email.address
L: list@email.address
S: Supported
F: file/pattern/
B: stable@email.address

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-23 23:01    [W:0.114 / U:3.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site