Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 21 Sep 2013 11:17:05 +0530 | From | "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <> | Subject | Re: Regression on cpufreq in v3.12-rc1 |
| |
On 09/20/2013 10:24 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 20 September 2013 20:46, Srivatsa S. Bhat > <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> I think show() and store() also suffer >> from a similar fate. So do you think we need to add these checks there as well? >> I'm not sure, since I can't think of a situation in which show() or store() >> can be invoked before the cpufreq-driver is registered.. or, is such a >> situation possible with cpufreq_disabled()? > > cpufreq_disabled() is supposed to be called at boot time, so that > cpufreq_core_init() fails.. and so show/store wouldn't exist without > a driver.. >
Ah, ok..
Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat
| |