[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering
On Friday, September 20, 2013 12:30:19 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Yinghai Lu <> wrote:
> >>
> >> I *think* we can just drop the module requesting stuff entirely, because it
> >> doesn't seem to work anyway and udev is handling this for us.
> >
> Yes. looks like acpi_processor_load_module() is not needed.
> udev will do the work.

OK, I'll cut a patch to drop that stuff.

I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-20 23:01    [W:0.034 / U:2.576 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site