Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Sep 2013 22:24:26 +0530 | Subject | Re: Regression on cpufreq in v3.12-rc1 | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 20 September 2013 20:46, Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > I think show() and store() also suffer > from a similar fate. So do you think we need to add these checks there as well? > I'm not sure, since I can't think of a situation in which show() or store() > can be invoked before the cpufreq-driver is registered.. or, is such a > situation possible with cpufreq_disabled()?
cpufreq_disabled() is supposed to be called at boot time, so that cpufreq_core_init() fails.. and so show/store wouldn't exist without a driver..
| |