lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Regression on cpufreq in v3.12-rc1
From
On 20 September 2013 20:46, Srivatsa S. Bhat
<srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> I think show() and store() also suffer
> from a similar fate. So do you think we need to add these checks there as well?
> I'm not sure, since I can't think of a situation in which show() or store()
> can be invoked before the cpufreq-driver is registered.. or, is such a
> situation possible with cpufreq_disabled()?

cpufreq_disabled() is supposed to be called at boot time, so that
cpufreq_core_init() fails.. and so show/store wouldn't exist without
a driver..


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-20 19:21    [W:0.049 / U:0.944 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site