[lkml]   [2013]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Regression on cpufreq in v3.12-rc1
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat
<> wrote:
> On 09/20/2013 08:51 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:

>> sa11x0_pcmcia_init() which starts this chain of events is called as
>> an fs_initcall(), see drivers/pcmcia/sa1100_generic.c
> But fs_initcall() comes after arch_initcall() right? (looking at
> include/linux/init.h). Since the corresponding cpufreq-driver (drivers/
> cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c) uses arch_initcall() to register itself, it
> is all the more surprising how this could happen...

Hm it does happen if the cpufreq driver does not probe *at all*
right? I will look closer at this, maybe it just doesn't register
properly for some SA1100 variants...

Linus Walleij

 \ /
  Last update: 2013-09-20 18:01    [W:0.056 / U:6.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site